The Pain Delivery Man
Why I Can't Listen to Elvis Costello's New Record
I don't argue that Elvis Costello isn't the greatest songwriter of the last 50 years; just that, if he is, I cannot recognize it.
I enjoy a reasonable acuity in the usual dilettantish pursuits, and ordinarily no one is a bigger booster of the intellectual process than I am, but it is no secret that my taste in pop music is terrible. Right now my favorite CD is a recording of 60's Soviet muzak.
I believe there are two reasons for this. One is physiological: my preternatural music-sensitivity lobe. A single note played on a violin by someone who knows what she's doing can release chemicals in my brain--called agonyzymes--that cause me to experience debilitating angst, penetrating sadness, or profound botheration. Alternatively (or is the word "alternately"?) the timbre of a singer's voice (say, Elvis Costello's) may cause this lobe to produce huge quantities of the same substance found in those whose skin crawls when they hear fingernails on a chalkboard.
Because of this unnatural lobe, music, unlike sculpture or literature, has the capacity to truly and literally torture me. Most often it is the critically beloved pop artistes who torture me the worst. I'm not against the virtuosic or phenomenally quirky or the exquisitely-produced on principle; I just want it not to inflict pain on me. I am not a masochist.
The second reason for my deficiency in pop music appreciation is laziness. I dislike having to exert myself with these accomplished songwriters, only to find that the payoff is no bigger than some tired display of wry irony combined with the dreaded "raw emotion." "You hurt me, leaving me bitter-yet-strangely-articulate" is fine, but if that's all I'm going to get, don't make me work for it. I'd rather listen to The Archies.
I don't argue that Elvis Costello isn't the greatest songwriter of the last 50 years; just that, if he is, I cannot recognize it.
I enjoy a reasonable acuity in the usual dilettantish pursuits, and ordinarily no one is a bigger booster of the intellectual process than I am, but it is no secret that my taste in pop music is terrible. Right now my favorite CD is a recording of 60's Soviet muzak.
I believe there are two reasons for this. One is physiological: my preternatural music-sensitivity lobe. A single note played on a violin by someone who knows what she's doing can release chemicals in my brain--called agonyzymes--that cause me to experience debilitating angst, penetrating sadness, or profound botheration. Alternatively (or is the word "alternately"?) the timbre of a singer's voice (say, Elvis Costello's) may cause this lobe to produce huge quantities of the same substance found in those whose skin crawls when they hear fingernails on a chalkboard.
Because of this unnatural lobe, music, unlike sculpture or literature, has the capacity to truly and literally torture me. Most often it is the critically beloved pop artistes who torture me the worst. I'm not against the virtuosic or phenomenally quirky or the exquisitely-produced on principle; I just want it not to inflict pain on me. I am not a masochist.
The second reason for my deficiency in pop music appreciation is laziness. I dislike having to exert myself with these accomplished songwriters, only to find that the payoff is no bigger than some tired display of wry irony combined with the dreaded "raw emotion." "You hurt me, leaving me bitter-yet-strangely-articulate" is fine, but if that's all I'm going to get, don't make me work for it. I'd rather listen to The Archies.


